Quality & Scoring

See the answers that are breaking your CSAT, before your customers do.

Every reply from Fin and your team is scored on 4 criteria: relevance, accuracy, tone, and completeness. The worst ones surface automatically, with the exact reason why they failed.

18%

of Fin answers score below 40/100

On average across Intercom workspaces, flagged automatically

A 98% resolution rate hides a lot.

1

Fin closes fast.

Intercom marks it resolved in seconds. That's the number your stakeholders see.

2

"Closed" isn't "correct".

A confident, wrong answer closes identically to a right one. The customer gets bad information, and your dashboard looks fine.

3

The damage compounds quietly.

Wrong answers don't spike your support queue. They spike your churn. By the time you notice, it's been happening for months.

What this costs you

Wrong answers per month

of your total volume

~18%

Reopen rate impact

of "resolved" conversations

+12–27%

Hours reviewing manually

at 500 conversations/month

40h

ResponZ surfaces this in 30 seconds without reading a single conversation.

4 criteria scored on every reply

Relevance

0–100

The answer addresses what the customer actually asked, not a deflection or a generic response.

Accuracy

0–100

The information matches your Help Center and your policies. No hallucinated facts, no outdated articles.

Tone

0–100

The reply fits your brand voice, professional, empathetic, and on-brand.

Completeness

0–100

All parts of the question get answered, not just the first clause.

Common questions

We already review conversations manually.

At 500 conversations a month, that's 40 hours. ResponZ does it in 30 seconds.

Fin has its own resolution score.

That score tells you it closed. Not if the answer was right.

Our team scores their own calls.

Self-evaluation has bias. ResponZ applies the same criteria to every reply, every time.

Find your worst Fin answer from last month.

Free · No credit card · 30 seconds to first insight

Start for free